Mississippi

(State)

Select another MS location
Indicators:
  • [X]

    Displays all indicators for this geography, A-Z.

  • [X]

    Data highlights selected by our KIDS COUNT state grantee.

  • [X]

    Full set of data provided by our KIDS COUNT state grantee.

  • [X]

    Key indicators of child well-being tracked in our annual KIDS COUNT Data Book.

  • [X]

    Nine indicators from the Early Reading Indicators: 2010 KIDS COUNT Special Report.

Notes/Sources:

When available, show
data as:

Profile for Mississippi (State)

Data Provided by: MS KIDS COUNT
  • Print
  • Email
TOOLBOX:

Early Reading Indicators: 2010 KIDS COUNT Special Report

4th grade reading achievement levels (Percent) Showing most recent 5 years; Show All Years
Achievement Level 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Below basic 51% 52% 49% 45% 45%
At or above basic 49% 48% 51% 55% 55%
Below proficient 82% 82% 81% 78% 78%
At or above proficient 18% 18% 19% 22% 22%
4th graders who scored below proficient reading level by school income (Percent)
School Income 2009 2011
School receives Title I funding 81% 79%
School does not receive Title I funding 64% 69%
4th graders who scored below proficient reading level by family income (Percent)
Family Income 2009 2011
Eligible for free/reduced school lunch 86% 85%
Not eligible for free/reduced school lunch 62% 60%
4th graders who scored below proficient reading level by race (Percent)
Race 2005 2007 2009 2011
White 69% 70% 69% 70%
Black or African American 93% 88% 92% 88%
Hispanic or Latino S 75% S 75%
Asian or Pacific Islander S S S S
American Indian S S S S
Two or More Races S S S S
4th graders who scored below proficient reading level by geographic location (Percent)
Geographic Location 2009 2011
City 87% 83%
Suburban 74% 78%
Town 83% 82%
Rural 75% 75%
4th graders who scored below proficient reading by English language learner status (Percent) Showing most recent 5 years; Show All Years
English Language Learner Status 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
English language learners S S S S S
Not English language learners 82% 82% 81% 78% 78%
4th graders who scored below proficient reading by disability status (Percent) Showing most recent 5 years; Show All Years
Students Disability Status 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Students with disabilities 88% 94% 90% 93% 95%
Students without disabilities 81% 81% 81% 77% 77%
Children ages 3 to 5 not enrolled in nursery school, preschool or kindergarten (Number)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
50,000 45,000 45,000 48,000 47,000
Children ages 3 to 5 not enrolled in nursery school, preschool or kindergarten (Percent)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
38% 36% 38% 38% 37%
Teens ages 16 to 19 not in school and not high school graduates (Number) Showing most recent 5 years; Show All Years
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
16,000 14,000 14,000 16,000 11,000
Teens ages 16 to 19 not in school and not high school graduates (Percent) Showing most recent 5 years; Show All Years
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
8% 7% 7% 9% 6%
Children below 200% poverty (Number) Showing most recent 5 years; Show All Years
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
405,000 414,000 410,000 426,000 433,000
Children below 200% poverty (Percent) Showing most recent 5 years; Show All Years
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
54% 55% 55% 57% 58%

There have been substantial changes made to the 2008 American Community Survey (ACS) questions on labor force participation and number of weeks worked.  After thoroughly investigating the extent to which each of the Kids Count indicators of economic well-being may be affected, we believe that the changes in methodology were significant enough to constitute a break in the trend. We therefore do not recommend that you make comparisons to previous years’ estimates.

 

For more detailed information about the changes made and tables comparing 2007 and 2008 state-level estimates of employment and unemployment read The Census Bureau notes at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/laborfor/researchnote092209.html

There have been substantial changes made to the 2008 American Community Survey (ACS) questions on labor force participation and number of weeks worked.  After thoroughly investigating the extent to which each of the Kids Count indicators of economic well-being may be affected, we believe that the changes in methodology were significant enough to constitute a break in the trend. We therefore do not recommend that you make comparisons to previous years’ estimates.

 

For more detailed information about the changes made and tables comparing 2007 and 2008 state-level estimates of employment and unemployment read The Census Bureau notes at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/laborfor/researchnote092209.html