Texas

Home> Data By State> Texas> Rankings/Maps/Trends by Topic

Geographic Areas:
  • select

(Class of 2006 - 2008) DO NOT COMPARE BETWEEN YEARS! (Percent) – 2008

Data Provided by: Center for Public Policy Priorities
  • Print
  • Email
  • Raw Data
TOOLBOX:

Scale: 0.0% - 28.1%
Scale
Texas 10.5%
Anderson 4.5% Barchart image
Andrews 17.0% Barchart image
Angelina 9.1% Barchart image
Aransas 7.1% Barchart image
Archer 1.4% Barchart image
Armstrong 4.3% Barchart image
Atascosa 9.3% Barchart image
Austin 2.6% Barchart image
Bailey 19.1% Barchart image
Bandera 7.4% Barchart image
Bastrop 9.6% Barchart image
Baylor 5.0% Barchart image
Bee 16.6% Barchart image
Bell 11.9% Barchart image
Bexar 14.2% Barchart image
Blanco 3.2% Barchart image
Borden 0.0% Barchart image
Bosque 2.0% Barchart image
Bowie 4.9% Barchart image
Brazoria 4.7% Barchart image
Brazos 9.3% Barchart image
Brewster 1.1% Barchart image
Briscoe 10.0% Barchart image
Brooks 11.5% Barchart image
Brown 5.2% Barchart image
Burleson 10.8% Barchart image
Burnet 3.3% Barchart image
Caldwell 9.0% Barchart image
Calhoun 2.7% Barchart image
Callahan 1.7% Barchart image
Cameron 13.2% Barchart image
Camp 6.1% Barchart image
Carson 3.5% Barchart image
Cass 3.1% Barchart image
Castro 6.4% Barchart image
Chambers 6.0% Barchart image
Cherokee 11.0% Barchart image
Childress 5.1% Barchart image
Clay 8.2% Barchart image
Cochran 6.5% Barchart image
Coke 8.3% Barchart image
Coleman 5.3% Barchart image
Collin 2.7% Barchart image
Collingsworth 5.0% Barchart image
Colorado 3.0% Barchart image
Comal 6.3% Barchart image
Comanche 10.3% Barchart image
Concho 7.1% Barchart image
Cooke 6.5% Barchart image
Coryell 10.0% Barchart image
Cottle 6.3% Barchart image
Crane 17.4% Barchart image
Crockett 5.2% Barchart image
Crosby 6.5% Barchart image
Culberson 8.2% Barchart image
Dallam 5.1% Barchart image
Dallas 15.4% Barchart image
Dawson 14.9% Barchart image
Deaf Smith 5.3% Barchart image
Delta 8.3% Barchart image
Denton 3.9% Barchart image
DeWitt 6.2% Barchart image
Dickens 3.3% Barchart image
Dimmit 9.0% Barchart image
Donley 13.6% Barchart image
Duval 28.1% Barchart image
Eastland 8.1% Barchart image
Ector 21.0% Barchart image
Edwards 5.1% Barchart image
El Paso 11.4% Barchart image
Ellis 5.8% Barchart image
Erath 4.0% Barchart image
Falls 9.9% Barchart image
Fannin 2.3% Barchart image
Fayette 4.6% Barchart image
Fisher 2.4% Barchart image
Floyd 5.6% Barchart image
Foard 0.0% Barchart image
Fort Bend 6.7% Barchart image
Franklin 0.0% Barchart image
Freestone 4.3% Barchart image
Frio 20.2% Barchart image
Gaines 3.0% Barchart image
Galveston 7.8% Barchart image
Garza 12.6% Barchart image
Gillespie 3.0% Barchart image
Glasscock 0.0% Barchart image
Goliad 2.8% Barchart image
Gonzales 12.9% Barchart image
Gray 1.1% Barchart image
Grayson 6.5% Barchart image
Gregg 9.6% Barchart image
Grimes 10.1% Barchart image
Guadalupe 8.0% Barchart image
Hale 14.3% Barchart image
Hall 1.6% Barchart image
Hamilton 0.8% Barchart image
Hansford 2.5% Barchart image
Hardeman 6.0% Barchart image
Hardin 6.0% Barchart image
Harris 13.6% Barchart image
Harrison 7.6% Barchart image
Hartley 5.9% Barchart image
Haskell 5.1% Barchart image
Hays 10.2% Barchart image
Hemphill 4.5% Barchart image
Henderson 3.9% Barchart image
Hidalgo 12.1% Barchart image
Hill 6.8% Barchart image
Hockley 8.8% Barchart image
Hood 12.1% Barchart image
Hopkins 6.8% Barchart image
Houston 14.0% Barchart image
Howard 5.7% Barchart image
Hudspeth 2.0% Barchart image
Hunt 8.5% Barchart image
Hutchinson 4.5% Barchart image
Irion 0.0% Barchart image
Jack 2.6% Barchart image
Jackson 6.6% Barchart image
Jasper 4.5% Barchart image
Jeff Davis 4.3% Barchart image
Jefferson 13.2% Barchart image
Jim Hogg 13.6% Barchart image
Jim Wells 26.3% Barchart image
Johnson 9.4% Barchart image
Jones 4.9% Barchart image
Karnes 6.0% Barchart image
Kaufman 5.4% Barchart image
Kendall 1.3% Barchart image
Kenedy NA
Kent 0.0% Barchart image
Kerr 3.9% Barchart image
Kimble 0.0% Barchart image
King 0.0% Barchart image
Kinney 7.0% Barchart image
Kleberg 15.5% Barchart image
Knox 6.5% Barchart image
La Salle 23.5% Barchart image
Lamar 10.5% Barchart image
Lamb 8.4% Barchart image
Lampasas 8.4% Barchart image
Lavaca 2.5% Barchart image
Lee 3.7% Barchart image
Leon 5.9% Barchart image
Liberty 11.3% Barchart image
Limestone 9.2% Barchart image
Lipscomb 5.7% Barchart image
Live Oak 6.8% Barchart image
Llano 5.4% Barchart image
Loving NA
Lubbock 8.1% Barchart image
Lynn 5.8% Barchart image
Madison 7.0% Barchart image
Marion 16.5% Barchart image
Martin 0.0% Barchart image
Mason 2.3% Barchart image
Matagorda 6.3% Barchart image
Maverick 14.1% Barchart image
McCulloch 0.9% Barchart image
McLennan 10.7% Barchart image
McMullen 0.0% Barchart image
Medina 5.1% Barchart image
Menard 0.0% Barchart image
Midland 12.2% Barchart image
Milam 5.2% Barchart image
Mills 3.2% Barchart image
Mitchell 8.0% Barchart image
Montague 7.0% Barchart image
Montgomery 4.6% Barchart image
Moore 2.4% Barchart image
Morris 7.5% Barchart image
Motley 0.0% Barchart image
Nacogdoches 8.3% Barchart image
Navarro 9.8% Barchart image
Newton 3.0% Barchart image
Nolan 2.8% Barchart image
Nueces 11.9% Barchart image
Ochiltree 1.4% Barchart image
Oldham 2.4% Barchart image
Orange 8.1% Barchart image
Palo Pinto 4.9% Barchart image
Panola 1.6% Barchart image
Parker 3.4% Barchart image
Parmer 5.5% Barchart image
Pecos 14.7% Barchart image
Polk 6.3% Barchart image
Potter 12.1% Barchart image
Presidio 0.9% Barchart image
Rains 4.3% Barchart image
Randall 1.4% Barchart image
Reagan 0.0% Barchart image
Real 12.1% Barchart image
Red River 3.2% Barchart image
Reeves 9.9% Barchart image
Refugio 6.5% Barchart image
Roberts 0.0% Barchart image
Robertson 2.7% Barchart image
Rockwall 2.1% Barchart image
Runnels 9.2% Barchart image
Rusk 3.6% Barchart image
Sabine 4.9% Barchart image
San Augustine 10.5% Barchart image
San Jacinto 7.4% Barchart image
San Patricio 11.3% Barchart image
San Saba 0.0% Barchart image
Schleicher 8.2% Barchart image
Scurry 11.0% Barchart image
Shackelford 3.3% Barchart image
Shelby 6.5% Barchart image
Sherman 7.8% Barchart image
Smith 8.6% Barchart image
Somervell 5.2% Barchart image
Starr 12.1% Barchart image
Stephens 13.5% Barchart image
Sterling 0.0% Barchart image
Stonewall 4.0% Barchart image
Sutton 1.7% Barchart image
Swisher 1.5% Barchart image
Tarrant 9.5% Barchart image
Taylor 7.1% Barchart image
Terrell 0.0% Barchart image
Terry 10.2% Barchart image
Throckmorton 2.6% Barchart image
Titus 7.0% Barchart image
Tom Green 13.6% Barchart image
Travis 11.8% Barchart image
Trinity 9.4% Barchart image
Tyler 2.7% Barchart image
Upshur 6.1% Barchart image
Upton 1.6% Barchart image
Uvalde 9.1% Barchart image
Val Verde 13.7% Barchart image
Van Zandt 5.6% Barchart image
Victoria 18.7% Barchart image
Walker 9.6% Barchart image
Waller 9.5% Barchart image
Ward 8.1% Barchart image
Washington 12.4% Barchart image
Webb 5.8% Barchart image
Wharton 6.5% Barchart image
Wheeler 4.7% Barchart image
Wichita 6.8% Barchart image
Wilbarger 4.7% Barchart image
Willacy 14.2% Barchart image
Williamson 6.7% Barchart image
Wilson 6.3% Barchart image
Winkler 15.4% Barchart image
Wise 3.1% Barchart image
Wood 8.1% Barchart image
Yoakum 2.5% Barchart image
Young 2.6% Barchart image
Zapata 10.1% Barchart image
Zavala 14.3% Barchart image

Definitions: The number and percent of students who dropped out between ninth grade and graduation.  Year indicates the graduating year of the cohort.

Data Source: Texas Education Agency.

Footnotes: TEA began rolling introduction to the NCES dropout definition with the class of 2006. Because the methodology is new, comparisons to rates for the Class of 2005 or earlier are invalid, and we no longer include pre-2005 data.

Furthermore, dropout and completion rates for the classes of 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 cannot be compared to each other because the new definition is being implemented on a rolling basis. In other words, the 2006 longitudinal dropout uses the old state definition for the freshman through junior years and the new definition for their senior year. For the class of 2007, TEA calculates the longitudinal rate using the old state definition for the first two years and the NCES definition for the last two years, etc. See table 2, on p.6 of TEA’s 2006-07 dropout report at: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/research/abs2.htm#Dropout.

A code of NA generally indicates that the number is masked, either because it is a low number event or because a different category that is a low number event could be imputed based on the number.  The exceptions to this code are Loving and Kenedy counties, for which NA indicates that the data is not available or not applicable.

Texas Grantee

Center for Public Policy Priorities 7020 Easy Wind Dr., Suite 200
Austin, TX 78752

512-320-0222 ext. 106
kidscount@cppp.org
http://www.cppp.org/kidscount

Frances Deviney, Ph.D., Senior Research Associate and Texas KIDS COUNT Director

The Center for Public Policy Priorities is a nonpartisan, nonprofit policy institute committed to improving public policies to better the economic and social conditions of low-and moderate-income Texans. To view the State of Texas Children data book, go to www.stateoftexaschildren.org.