Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Participants - Indiana

Indiana

Home> Data By State> Indiana> Rankings/Maps/Trends by Topic

Geographic Areas:

Show County Data

Year:

Data Type:

Percent
Number

Sort order/by:

select
Alphabetical by Region
Pregnant
Breastfeeding
Non-Breastfeeding
Child
Infant
Total Participants

WIC category:
select
Pregnant
Breastfeeding
Non-Breastfeeding
Child
Infant
Total Participants
Show All

Create a new report

Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Participants (Percent) – 2011

Data Provided by: Indiana Youth Institute

TOOLBOX:

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Indiana
Pregnant	17.5%
Breastfeeding	4.0%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.7%
Child	40.1%
Infant	30.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Adams
Pregnant	17.9%
Breastfeeding	4.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.2%
Child	40.6%
Infant	30.0%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Allen
Pregnant	17.5%
Breastfeeding	3.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.7%
Child	42.2%
Infant	29.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Bartholomew
Pregnant	18.7%
Breastfeeding	4.1%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.2%
Child	38.1%
Infant	30.9%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Benton
Pregnant	13.4%
Breastfeeding	3.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	5.8%
Child	55.4%
Infant	22.0%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Blackford
Pregnant	18.7%
Breastfeeding	3.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.7%
Child	39.9%
Infant	31.2%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Boone
Pregnant	17.0%
Breastfeeding	3.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.8%
Child	40.5%
Infant	30.9%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Brown
Pregnant	16.3%
Breastfeeding	5.1%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.8%
Child	44.1%
Infant	27.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Carroll
Pregnant	14.7%
Breastfeeding	4.1%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.3%
Child	46.8%
Infant	27.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Cass
Pregnant	18.3%
Breastfeeding	3.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.6%
Child	43.1%
Infant	28.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Clark
Pregnant	17.2%
Breastfeeding	4.7%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.8%
Child	41.5%
Infant	29.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Clay
Pregnant	20.4%
Breastfeeding	2.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.2%
Child	40.9%
Infant	29.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Clinton
Pregnant	16.7%
Breastfeeding	3.0%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.0%
Child	46.0%
Infant	27.3%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Crawford
Pregnant	19.2%
Breastfeeding	4.1%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.0%
Child	41.6%
Infant	28.2%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Daviess
Pregnant	19.2%
Breastfeeding	2.6%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.0%
Child	43.4%
Infant	28.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Dearborn
Pregnant	18.5%
Breastfeeding	2.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.2%
Child	41.2%
Infant	29.2%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Decatur
Pregnant	17.2%
Breastfeeding	3.8%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.9%
Child	41.6%
Infant	30.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

DeKalb
Pregnant	17.3%
Breastfeeding	5.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.6%
Child	40.0%
Infant	30.2%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Delaware
Pregnant	17.1%
Breastfeeding	4.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.5%
Child	38.0%
Infant	32.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Dubois
Pregnant	15.6%
Breastfeeding	5.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.2%
Child	42.0%
Infant	29.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Elkhart
Pregnant	18.7%
Breastfeeding	4.2%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.4%
Child	41.9%
Infant	28.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Fayette
Pregnant	16.0%
Breastfeeding	3.0%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.5%
Child	41.0%
Infant	30.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Floyd
Pregnant	19.4%
Breastfeeding	4.2%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.1%
Child	38.3%
Infant	31.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Fountain
Pregnant	17.5%
Breastfeeding	3.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.8%
Child	43.1%
Infant	28.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Franklin
Pregnant	17.4%
Breastfeeding	2.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.8%
Child	39.5%
Infant	31.4%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Fulton
Pregnant	17.0%
Breastfeeding	3.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.0%
Child	40.6%
Infant	30.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Gibson
Pregnant	19.3%
Breastfeeding	3.0%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.5%
Child	36.2%
Infant	32.0%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Grant
Pregnant	16.6%
Breastfeeding	2.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.8%
Child	42.7%
Infant	30.0%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Greene
Pregnant	18.6%
Breastfeeding	2.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.1%
Child	42.1%
Infant	29.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Hamilton
Pregnant	16.0%
Breastfeeding	5.8%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.2%
Child	40.3%
Infant	30.7%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Hancock
Pregnant	18.6%
Breastfeeding	4.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.2%
Child	35.3%
Infant	32.4%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Harrison
Pregnant	18.3%
Breastfeeding	3.0%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.4%
Child	41.8%
Infant	29.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Hendricks
Pregnant	17.4%
Breastfeeding	4.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.7%
Child	35.7%
Infant	34.9%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Henry
Pregnant	18.0%
Breastfeeding	3.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.3%
Child	41.9%
Infant	29.4%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Howard
Pregnant	17.4%
Breastfeeding	2.7%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.6%
Child	41.5%
Infant	29.9%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Huntington
Pregnant	18.9%
Breastfeeding	3.2%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.5%
Child	40.1%
Infant	30.3%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Jackson
Pregnant	18.2%
Breastfeeding	3.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.2%
Child	41.5%
Infant	29.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Jasper
Pregnant	16.0%
Breastfeeding	4.1%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.3%
Child	41.2%
Infant	30.4%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Jay
Pregnant	16.9%
Breastfeeding	3.6%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.3%
Child	40.6%
Infant	30.7%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Jefferson
Pregnant	18.1%
Breastfeeding	4.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.9%
Child	38.7%
Infant	31.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Jennings
Pregnant	18.9%
Breastfeeding	2.6%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.8%
Child	44.9%
Infant	26.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Johnson
Pregnant	16.6%
Breastfeeding	4.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.8%
Child	38.1%
Infant	31.7%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Knox
Pregnant	20.0%
Breastfeeding	3.2%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.8%
Child	37.5%
Infant	32.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Kosciusko
Pregnant	17.9%
Breastfeeding	3.6%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.0%
Child	41.5%
Infant	30.0%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

LaGrange
Pregnant	15.6%
Breastfeeding	4.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.1%
Child	44.8%
Infant	28.0%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Lake
Pregnant	16.6%
Breastfeeding	3.7%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.0%
Child	41.5%
Infant	30.2%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

LaPorte
Pregnant	18.4%
Breastfeeding	3.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.7%
Child	40.5%
Infant	30.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Lawrence
Pregnant	17.9%
Breastfeeding	2.2%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.2%
Child	39.4%
Infant	31.3%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Madison
Pregnant	17.5%
Breastfeeding	3.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.7%
Child	36.6%
Infant	32.3%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Marion
Pregnant	16.4%
Breastfeeding	5.0%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.5%
Child	38.0%
Infant	32.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Marshall
Pregnant	17.7%
Breastfeeding	3.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.2%
Child	42.0%
Infant	29.2%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Martin
Pregnant	17.6%
Breastfeeding	3.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.3%
Child	44.6%
Infant	28.2%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Miami
Pregnant	17.1%
Breastfeeding	2.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.6%
Child	44.4%
Infant	28.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Monroe
Pregnant	18.2%
Breastfeeding	6.1%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.0%
Child	39.2%
Infant	30.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Montgomery
Pregnant	18.0%
Breastfeeding	2.8%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.4%
Child	40.4%
Infant	30.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Morgan
Pregnant	16.5%
Breastfeeding	3.8%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.7%
Child	39.0%
Infant	31.0%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Newton
Pregnant	15.8%
Breastfeeding	3.6%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.4%
Child	46.4%
Infant	26.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Noble
Pregnant	15.8%
Breastfeeding	6.2%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.4%
Child	41.1%
Infant	30.4%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Ohio
Pregnant	15.3%
Breastfeeding	4.7%
Non-Breastfeeding	10.5%
Child	38.4%
Infant	31.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Orange
Pregnant	15.8%
Breastfeeding	4.8%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.3%
Child	42.6%
Infant	29.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Owen
Pregnant	17.7%
Breastfeeding	3.6%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.3%
Child	41.0%
Infant	29.3%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Parke
Pregnant	17.3%
Breastfeeding	1.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.7%
Child	38.8%
Infant	32.7%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Perry
Pregnant	17.0%
Breastfeeding	2.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	11.7%
Child	36.6%
Infant	32.3%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Pike
Pregnant	19.1%
Breastfeeding	2.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	10.6%
Child	35.9%
Infant	31.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Porter
Pregnant	17.7%
Breastfeeding	4.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.7%
Child	40.2%
Infant	30.0%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Posey
Pregnant	16.1%
Breastfeeding	2.2%
Non-Breastfeeding	10.7%
Child	35.6%
Infant	35.4%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Pulaski
Pregnant	13.6%
Breastfeeding	3.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.6%
Child	44.9%
Infant	28.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Putnam
Pregnant	18.0%
Breastfeeding	3.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.6%
Child	42.5%
Infant	28.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Randolph
Pregnant	19.1%
Breastfeeding	3.6%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.2%
Child	38.4%
Infant	30.7%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Ripley
Pregnant	16.7%
Breastfeeding	2.6%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.6%
Child	41.4%
Infant	29.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Rush
Pregnant	18.4%
Breastfeeding	2.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.7%
Child	38.6%
Infant	30.9%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

St. Joseph
Pregnant	18.6%
Breastfeeding	4.7%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.6%
Child	39.2%
Infant	30.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Scott
Pregnant	18.7%
Breastfeeding	2.0%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.6%
Child	42.1%
Infant	29.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Shelby
Pregnant	19.3%
Breastfeeding	4.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.7%
Child	35.7%
Infant	32.9%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Spencer
Pregnant	17.7%
Breastfeeding	3.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.5%
Child	39.8%
Infant	31.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Starke
Pregnant	17.4%
Breastfeeding	2.7%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.1%
Child	45.3%
Infant	27.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Steuben
Pregnant	18.3%
Breastfeeding	3.8%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.4%
Child	45.0%
Infant	26.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Sullivan
Pregnant	22.2%
Breastfeeding	3.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.3%
Child	33.8%
Infant	34.1%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Switzerland
Pregnant	16.0%
Breastfeeding	2.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.7%
Child	44.3%
Infant	28.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Tippecanoe
Pregnant	18.6%
Breastfeeding	5.2%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.4%
Child	40.6%
Infant	29.2%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Tipton
Pregnant	17.8%
Breastfeeding	3.0%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.6%
Child	40.3%
Infant	30.3%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Union
Pregnant	14.3%
Breastfeeding	3.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	9.6%
Child	43.3%
Infant	29.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Vanderburgh
Pregnant	20.4%
Breastfeeding	2.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.1%
Child	36.8%
Infant	34.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Vermillion
Pregnant	18.8%
Breastfeeding	2.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.8%
Child	42.5%
Infant	28.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Vigo
Pregnant	20.3%
Breastfeeding	2.8%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.4%
Child	36.7%
Infant	33.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Wabash
Pregnant	18.1%
Breastfeeding	2.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	6.4%
Child	45.4%
Infant	27.6%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Warren
Pregnant	19.1%
Breastfeeding	2.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.9%
Child	40.3%
Infant	30.3%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Warrick
Pregnant	17.9%
Breastfeeding	2.9%
Non-Breastfeeding	8.6%
Child	39.2%
Infant	31.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Washington
Pregnant	17.7%
Breastfeeding	3.5%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.2%
Child	43.9%
Infant	27.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Wayne
Pregnant	18.9%
Breastfeeding	3.6%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.3%
Child	40.3%
Infant	29.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Wells
Pregnant	18.8%
Breastfeeding	3.1%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.8%
Child	41.5%
Infant	28.8%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

White
Pregnant	19.0%
Breastfeeding	3.3%
Non-Breastfeeding	7.8%
Child	40.2%
Infant	29.7%
Total Participants	100.0%

Scale: 1.4% - 100.0%

Whitley
Pregnant	16.7%
Breastfeeding	6.4%
Non-Breastfeeding	5.6%
Child	41.9%
Infant	29.5%
Total Participants	100.0%

Definitions: The number of women, infants, and children receiving nutrition education and dietary supplements through the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program.

Data Source: Indiana State Department of Health, WIC Division.

Footnotes: Data is for Federal Fiscal Year (FFY).

For more data on the WIC program in Indiana specifically, please visit: http://www.in.gov/isdh/24849.htm

For more data on the WIC program at the state and national level, please visit: http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/wicmain.htm

Indiana Grantee

Indiana Youth Institute 603 E. Washington St.
Suite 800
Indianapolis, IN 46204

800-343-7060
data@iyi.org
http://www.iyi.org

Sarah Patterson, Project Manager

The Indiana Youth Institute promotes the healthy development of Indiana children and youth by serving the people, institutions and communities that impact their well-being. For more data on Hoosier children, please visit www.iyi.org.

Kids Count Data Center

Indiana

Geographic Areas:

Year:

Data Type:

Sort order/by:

WIC category:

Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Participants (Percent) – 2011

TOOLBOX:

Indiana Grantee

Related Kids Count Data

Data Center

KIDS COUNT Census Data Online