Data Across States

Home> Data Across States> Rankings/Maps/Trends by Topic

Geographic Areas:
  • select
  • Gender:
  • select

Children who are confirmed by child protective services as victims of maltreatment by gender (Percent) – 2011

Data Provided by: National KIDS COUNT Program
  • Print
  • Email
  • Raw Data
TOOLBOX:

Scale: 33% - 100%
United States Scale
Female 51%
Male 49%
Total 100%
Scale: 33% - 100%
Alabama Scale
Female 57% Barchart image
Male 43% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Alaska Scale
Female 51% Barchart image
Male 49% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Arizona Scale
Female 49% Barchart image
Male 51% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Arkansas Scale
Female 54% Barchart image
Male 46% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
California Scale
Female 52% Barchart image
Male 48% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Colorado Scale
Female 51% Barchart image
Male 49% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Connecticut Scale
Female N.A.
Male N.A.
Total N.A.
Scale: 33% - 100%
Delaware Scale
Female 52% Barchart image
Male 48% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Florida Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Georgia Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Hawaii Scale
Female 49% Barchart image
Male 51% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Idaho Scale
Female 49% Barchart image
Male 51% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Illinois Scale
Female 51% Barchart image
Male 49% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Indiana Scale
Female 53% Barchart image
Male 47% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Iowa Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Kansas Scale
Female 60% Barchart image
Male 40% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Kentucky Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Louisiana Scale
Female 51% Barchart image
Male 49% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Maine Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Maryland Scale
Female 52% Barchart image
Male 48% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Massachusetts Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Michigan Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Minnesota Scale
Female 53% Barchart image
Male 47% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Mississippi Scale
Female 54% Barchart image
Male 46% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Missouri Scale
Female 55% Barchart image
Male 45% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Montana Scale
Female 48% Barchart image
Male 52% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Nebraska Scale
Female 51% Barchart image
Male 49% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Nevada Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
New Hampshire Scale
Female 49% Barchart image
Male 51% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
New Jersey Scale
Female 52% Barchart image
Male 48% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
New Mexico Scale
Female 49% Barchart image
Male 51% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
New York Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
North Carolina Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
North Dakota Scale
Female 51% Barchart image
Male 49% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Ohio Scale
Female 53% Barchart image
Male 47% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Oklahoma Scale
Female 51% Barchart image
Male 49% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Oregon Scale
Female N.A.
Male N.A.
Total N.A.
Scale: 33% - 100%
Pennsylvania Scale
Female 67% Barchart image
Male 33% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Rhode Island Scale
Female 49% Barchart image
Male 51% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
South Carolina Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
South Dakota Scale
Female 51% Barchart image
Male 49% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Tennessee Scale
Female 55% Barchart image
Male 45% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Texas Scale
Female 52% Barchart image
Male 48% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Utah Scale
Female 53% Barchart image
Male 47% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Vermont Scale
Female 61% Barchart image
Male 39% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Virginia Scale
Female 53% Barchart image
Male 47% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Washington Scale
Female 51% Barchart image
Male 49% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
West Virginia Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Wisconsin Scale
Female 56% Barchart image
Male 44% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
Wyoming Scale
Female 50% Barchart image
Male 50% Barchart image
Total 100% Barchart image
Scale: 33% - 100%
District of Columbia Scale
Female 50%
Male 50%
Total 100%
Scale: 33% - 100%
Puerto Rico Scale
Female 51%
Male 49%
Total 100%
Scale: 33% - 100%
Virgin Islands Scale
Female N.A.
Male N.A.
Total N.A.

Definitions: Victimized children include those who are the subject of at least one substantiated or indicated maltreatment report, and/or who were identified as alternative response victims. Rates of maltreated children are per 1,000 children less than 18 years old. It is important to note that the numbers presented here cannot include victimized children who have never been made known to the system through a maltreatment report. Because of this, and because of state differences in policies and practices—including variations in the legal definitions of maltreatment—readers should exercise caution in interpreting trends and in making state-by-state comparisons.

To the extent possible, we use the same definition of substantiation as the Child Maltreatment report. Unlike many of the tabulations in Child Maltreatment our analyses examined the number of children who were maltreated, not the number of maltreatment incidents. Since a child can be the subject of more than one maltreatment incident, the numbers of children in each category presented here will be smaller than Child Maltreatment’s tabulations pertaining to numbers of incidents. Cases of maltreatment where the victim was not yet born, or was more than 17 years old are not included.  State estimates are shown only for states with valid data. The state is suppressed on records for fatalities on the publicly-available NCANDS file in order to protect confidentiality. Of all the fatalities, some had prior investigations (in the same fiscal year) for maltreatment reports and others did not.  Prior to 2010, fatalities were included in our National totals. Beginning in 2010, our national total includes the fatalities if they also had a prior investigation report which was not associated with a fatality, but otherwise fatalities are excluded. We made this exclusion because it is not possible on the public-use file to identify which of the children who died also have a record indicating a prior maltreatment investigation, and because we found that National totals are closer to Child Maltreatment published estimates with this approach (i.e., national estimates are overestimated to a greater degree when fatalities are included than the degree to which they are underestimated if fatalities are excluded).  Due to missing state data, National totals are not provided before 2004. National estimates include Puerto Rico after 2005.

More...

Data Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) Child File, FFY 2000–2011. NCANDS data used with permission from Cornell University’s National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect website, http://www.ndacan.cornell.edu. The collector of the original data, the funding agency, NDACAN, Cornell University, and the agents or employees of these institutions bear no responsibility for the analyses or interpretations presented here. More...

Footnotes: Updated April 2013.
N.A. – Data not available.

Note: The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are not included in maps and rankings because they are not states and therefore comparisons on many indicators of child well being are not meaningful.

National KIDS COUNT Program

KIDS COUNT
The Annie E. Casey Foundation
701 St. Paul Street
Baltimore, MD 21202

ph: 410-547-6600
fax: 410-547-6624
http://www.kidscount.org

Data Updates, New Reports & More

Sign-up for the KIDS COUNT Mailing list



Follow KIDS COUNT on