Data Across States

Home> Data Across States> Rankings/Maps/Trends by Topic

Geographic Areas:
  • select
  • Age group:
  • select

Children in low-income working families by age group (Percent) – 2007

Data Provided by: National KIDS COUNT Program
  • Print
  • Email
  • Raw Data
TOOLBOX:

Scale: 12% - 29%
United States Scale
less than 6 22%
less than 13 22%
less than 18 21%
Scale: 12% - 29%
Alabama Scale
less than 6 23% Barchart image
less than 13 23% Barchart image
less than 18 22% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Alaska Scale
less than 6 17% Barchart image
less than 13 16% Barchart image
less than 18 13% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Arizona Scale
less than 6 26% Barchart image
less than 13 26% Barchart image
less than 18 25% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Arkansas Scale
less than 6 26% Barchart image
less than 13 27% Barchart image
less than 18 26% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
California Scale
less than 6 22% Barchart image
less than 13 23% Barchart image
less than 18 22% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Colorado Scale
less than 6 21% Barchart image
less than 13 20% Barchart image
less than 18 19% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Connecticut Scale
less than 6 13% Barchart image
less than 13 13% Barchart image
less than 18 12% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Delaware Scale
less than 6 22% Barchart image
less than 13 20% Barchart image
less than 18 19% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Florida Scale
less than 6 24% Barchart image
less than 13 24% Barchart image
less than 18 23% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Georgia Scale
less than 6 23% Barchart image
less than 13 23% Barchart image
less than 18 21% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Hawaii Scale
less than 6 17% Barchart image
less than 13 16% Barchart image
less than 18 15% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Idaho Scale
less than 6 27% Barchart image
less than 13 27% Barchart image
less than 18 25% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Illinois Scale
less than 6 20% Barchart image
less than 13 21% Barchart image
less than 18 20% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Indiana Scale
less than 6 21% Barchart image
less than 13 22% Barchart image
less than 18 20% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Iowa Scale
less than 6 21% Barchart image
less than 13 21% Barchart image
less than 18 20% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Kansas Scale
less than 6 25% Barchart image
less than 13 24% Barchart image
less than 18 22% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Kentucky Scale
less than 6 24% Barchart image
less than 13 23% Barchart image
less than 18 22% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Louisiana Scale
less than 6 24% Barchart image
less than 13 23% Barchart image
less than 18 23% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Maine Scale
less than 6 20% Barchart image
less than 13 21% Barchart image
less than 18 20% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Maryland Scale
less than 6 13% Barchart image
less than 13 13% Barchart image
less than 18 13% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Massachusetts Scale
less than 6 13% Barchart image
less than 13 12% Barchart image
less than 18 12% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Michigan Scale
less than 6 19% Barchart image
less than 13 20% Barchart image
less than 18 19% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Minnesota Scale
less than 6 17% Barchart image
less than 13 17% Barchart image
less than 18 15% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Mississippi Scale
less than 6 22% Barchart image
less than 13 24% Barchart image
less than 18 23% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Missouri Scale
less than 6 22% Barchart image
less than 13 22% Barchart image
less than 18 21% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Montana Scale
less than 6 27% Barchart image
less than 13 26% Barchart image
less than 18 24% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Nebraska Scale
less than 6 22% Barchart image
less than 13 24% Barchart image
less than 18 22% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Nevada Scale
less than 6 21% Barchart image
less than 13 20% Barchart image
less than 18 20% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
New Hampshire Scale
less than 6 13% Barchart image
less than 13 13% Barchart image
less than 18 12% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
New Jersey Scale
less than 6 14% Barchart image
less than 13 14% Barchart image
less than 18 13% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
New Mexico Scale
less than 6 27% Barchart image
less than 13 28% Barchart image
less than 18 27% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
New York Scale
less than 6 21% Barchart image
less than 13 21% Barchart image
less than 18 20% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
North Carolina Scale
less than 6 24% Barchart image
less than 13 24% Barchart image
less than 18 23% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
North Dakota Scale
less than 6 19% Barchart image
less than 13 20% Barchart image
less than 18 19% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Ohio Scale
less than 6 21% Barchart image
less than 13 20% Barchart image
less than 18 19% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Oklahoma Scale
less than 6 29% Barchart image
less than 13 28% Barchart image
less than 18 26% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Oregon Scale
less than 6 22% Barchart image
less than 13 22% Barchart image
less than 18 21% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Pennsylvania Scale
less than 6 18% Barchart image
less than 13 19% Barchart image
less than 18 18% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Rhode Island Scale
less than 6 15% Barchart image
less than 13 16% Barchart image
less than 18 15% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
South Carolina Scale
less than 6 25% Barchart image
less than 13 24% Barchart image
less than 18 23% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
South Dakota Scale
less than 6 21% Barchart image
less than 13 25% Barchart image
less than 18 24% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Tennessee Scale
less than 6 24% Barchart image
less than 13 23% Barchart image
less than 18 22% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Texas Scale
less than 6 29% Barchart image
less than 13 28% Barchart image
less than 18 27% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Utah Scale
less than 6 26% Barchart image
less than 13 25% Barchart image
less than 18 23% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Vermont Scale
less than 6 22% Barchart image
less than 13 21% Barchart image
less than 18 19% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Virginia Scale
less than 6 17% Barchart image
less than 13 16% Barchart image
less than 18 16% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Washington Scale
less than 6 19% Barchart image
less than 13 19% Barchart image
less than 18 18% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
West Virginia Scale
less than 6 21% Barchart image
less than 13 22% Barchart image
less than 18 22% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Wisconsin Scale
less than 6 19% Barchart image
less than 13 20% Barchart image
less than 18 18% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Wyoming Scale
less than 6 17% Barchart image
less than 13 18% Barchart image
less than 18 17% Barchart image
Scale: 12% - 29%
Puerto Rico Scale
less than 6 35%
less than 13 35%
less than 18 34%
Scale: 12% - 29%
Virgin Islands Scale
less than 6 N.A.
less than 13 N.A.
less than 18 N.A.

Definitions: The share of own children under age 18 living in families that met two criteria: (1) the family income was less than twice the federal poverty level; (2) at least one parent worked 50 or more weeks during the previous year. We use the "200 percent of poverty" threshold for this measure because it is a cutoff point commonly used to identify low-income families. For example, the U.S. Census Bureau uses 200 percent of poverty as a key threshold in their annual poverty reports, and the Urban Institute uses this level in many of their New Federalism reports. Furthermore, people with family incomes between 100 and 200 percent of poverty are eligible for many government means-tested assistance programs--for example the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), many of the state Child Health Insurance Programs (sCHIP), and food stamps.
Researchers have used a wide range of employment thresholds to identify low-income working families--from any work during the year to full-time, year-round employment. Some have actually combined the hours worked by all adults in the household to determine work effort. We use 50 weeks of work to identify working families. This includes people who worked part-time as well as those who worked full-time. However the vast majority of people who worked at least 50 weeks during the year worked full-time (i.e., 35 hours or more a week).
More...

Data Source: Population Reference Bureau, analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Supplementary Survey, 2001 Supplementary Survey, 2002 through 2007 American Community Survey. The data for this measure come from the 2000 and 2001 Supplementary Survey and the 2002 through 2007 American Community Survey (ACS). The 2000 through 2004 ACS surveyed approximately 700,000 households monthly during each calendar year. In general but particularly for these years, use caution when interpreting estimates for less populous states or indicators representing a small sub-population, where the sample size is relatively small. Beginning in January 2005, the U.S. Census Bureau expanded the ACS sample to 3 million households (full implementation), and in January 2006 the ACS included group quarters. The ACS, fully implemented, is designed to provide annually updated social, economic, and housing data for states and communities. (Such local-area data have traditionally been collected once every ten years in the long form of the decennial census.) More...

Footnotes: Updated February 2009.
S - Estimates suppressed when the confidence interval around the percentage is greater than or equal to 10 percentage points. N.A. – Data not available.
Data are provided for the 50 most populous cities according to the most recent Census counts.  Cities for which data is collected may change over time.
A 90 percent confidence interval for each estimate can be found at
Children in low-income working families by age group.

Note: The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are not included in maps and rankings because they are not states and therefore comparisons on many indicators of child well being are not meaningful.

National KIDS COUNT Program

KIDS COUNT
The Annie E. Casey Foundation
701 St. Paul Street
Baltimore, MD 21202

ph: 410-547-6600
fax: 410-547-6624
http://www.kidscount.org

Data Updates, New Reports & More

Sign-up for the KIDS COUNT Mailing list



Follow KIDS COUNT on