Data Across States

Home> Data Across States> Rankings/Maps/Trends by Topic

Geographic Areas:
  • Children in Immigrant Families:
  • select

Children living in crowded households by children in immigrant families: Children in immigrant families (Percent) – 2000-2002

Data Provided by: National KIDS COUNT Program
TOOLBOX:

9% - 18%
Maine 9%
New Hampshire 11%
Vermont 14%
Rhode Island 14%
Connecticut 15%
Pennsylvania 16%
Montana 16%
Mississippi 16%
Louisiana 17%
Massachusetts 18%
Delaware 18%
19% - 26%
Maryland 19%
Kansas 19%
Michigan 19%
Virginia 19%
Kentucky 20%
Ohio 21%
New Jersey 22%
North Dakota 23%
Missouri 23%
Florida 24%
West Virginia 25%
South Carolina 25%
Indiana 25%
Georgia 26%
27% - 36%
Iowa 28%
South Dakota 28%
Illinois 29%
Alabama 30%
Utah 30%
Tennessee 30%
Wyoming 31%
Alaska 31%
Washington 32%
Colorado 32%
Arkansas 33%
New Mexico 33%
Oregon 33%
New York 35%
Oklahoma 35%
Nevada 36%
37% - 48%
North Carolina 38%
Texas 38%
Minnesota 38%
Nebraska 40%
Idaho 40%
Wisconsin 41%
Arizona 43%
Hawaii 48%
California 48%

Definitions: The share of children under age 18 living in households that have more than 1.00 persons per room, by children in foreign-born or US-born families. The ratio of occupants per room is derived by dividing the number of persons in the housing unit by the number of rooms in the housing unit. A housing unit is considered crowded if there is more than 1.00 persons per room. Occupants per room is rounded to the nearest hundredth.
Children in immigrant families is defined as children who are themselves foreign-born or reside with at least one foreign-born parent. Foreign-born is defined as either a U.S. citizen by naturalization or not a citizen of the U.S. Native-born is defined as born in the U.S., Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or the Northern Marianas or born abroad of American parents. The foreign-born status of children not living with either parent is based solely on the status of the child and no other household member. Children living in subfamilies are linked to their parent(s) and not the householder.
More...

Data Source: Population Reference Bureau, analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Supplementary Survey, 2001 Supplementary Survey, 2002 through 2011 American Community Survey. The data for this measure come from the 2000 and 2001 Supplementary Survey and the 2002 through 2011 American Community Survey (ACS). The 2000 through 2004 ACS surveyed approximately 700,000 households monthly during each calendar year. In general but particularly for these years, use caution when interpreting estimates for less populous states or indicators representing small sub-populations, where the sample size is relatively small. Beginning in January 2005, the U.S. Census Bureau expanded the ACS sample to 3 million households (full implementation), and in January 2006 the ACS included group quarters. The ACS, fully implemented, is designed to provide annually updated social, economic, and housing data for states and communities. (Such local-area data have traditionally been collected once every ten years in the long form of the decennial census.)
Estimates for years 2000 though 2004 are presented by a series of 3-year averages computed by PRB--the first year 2000 to 2002, the second year 2001 to 2003 and the third year 2002 to 2004. The 2005 ACS, is the first year with an expanded sample and is presented by estimates with a single year of data.
More...

Footnotes: Updated November 2012.
S - Estimates suppressed when the confidence interval around the percentage is greater than or equal to 10 percentage points. N.A. – Data not available.
Data are provided for the 50 most populous cities according to the most recent Census counts.  Cities for which data is collected may change over time.
A 90 percent confidence interval for each estimate can be found at
Children living in crowded households by children in immigrant families.

Note: Maps use the natural break classification method, which reflects patterns in the data by dividing the map into naturally occurring groups. Using statistical tools, this method determines cut-off points for each group by identifying large gaps in data values.

Note: The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are not included in maps and rankings because they are not states and therefore comparisons on many indicators of child well being are not meaningful.

National KIDS COUNT Program

KIDS COUNT
The Annie E. Casey Foundation
701 St. Paul Street
Baltimore, MD 21202

ph: 410-547-6600
fax: 410-547-6624
http://www.kidscount.org

Data Updates, New Reports & More

Sign-up for the KIDS COUNT Mailing list



Follow KIDS COUNT on